EMAL News
New EMAL Seminar Series 2007
Past EMAL Seminars & Workshops 2005-6
EMAL TV & Movies
Frequently Asked Questions
Home | Locations | WebCams | Facilities and Instruments | References | About EMAL | External Links | Site Map
EMAL Seminar Number 1 in an Occasional Series

EMAL is pleased to present:

Professor Brendan J. Griffin
Associate Professor And Director of the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis
at the University of Western Australia

10am, Wednesday, May 11th, 2005
Room 2246
Space Research Building
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143
(same building as North Campus EMAL)

Recent experiences with nanoSIMS 50 ion probes, high resolution FEGSEM and variable pressure SEM in materials characterization to the nanometre scale.

Nanotechnology is a new driving force in materials development and characterization. The scale of information required has pushed the development of new microscopy tools. One important new tool is the scanning ion probe with beam sizes down to 25nm, ppb level analytical sensitivity, high mass resolution (~4500) and the capacity to measure across the entire Periodic Table (CAMECA nanoSIMS 50). Secondly, in conventional SEM the new generation columns with field emission sources (FEGSEM) and in-lens detectors have achieved remarkable progress to the extent that the performance and image information is sometimes not well understood nor explained by conventional ‘wisdom’ but the data remains useful. There are also new challenges with respect to sample preparation, including mounting and coating. In VPSEM the barrier is poor signal/noise in the SE images; it prevents the full utilization of the primary beam resolution.

Our current research into thin films, nanoparticle structure and growth (Pt, ZnO and CeO), diamond growth and nanotube structure has been well supported by these new ion probe and SEM developments and these applications will be reviewed together with our current performance characterization protocols and results.

In another application, the new contrast information seen in the secondary images from the in-lens detector in the FEGSEM has also shown us, for the first time, lateral surface contamination by the Cs ion beam around areas examined by our nanoSIMS 50 ion microprobe. The critical observation here is that this data appears to be a result of field emission from the sample induced by the local fields. If true, this potentially offers a new imaging regime. Other examples will be shown to support this proposal.

Variable pressure SEM detector technologies are also progressing and low accelerating voltage imaging conditions are achievable, providing an ability to obtain high resolution data on, for example, quartz templates and mineral surfaces, without sample preparation of any form (except perhaps hitting it with a hammer so it fits in the chamber).

Copyright © EMAL & MSE Department, University of Michigan & John F. Mansfield ( jfmjfm@umich.edu)